|
vol. title: Vol Four of The Theosophical Society of The Arya Samaj of Arya-wart vol. period: Sept 1878 – Sept 1879 pages in vol.: 350 | |
< Misrepresentation (continued from page 8-93) >
“No leprous churl, no wretch consumed of cancer, |
“And I who hearkened to their prayers and praises, |
“Then came the time when I, the gentle master, |
“Scoffed at in insolent ways, but still undaunted, |
“Or curse the fools that harmed me, for those voices— |
“And in the depths of my great degradation, |
“So, when poor Judas, one whom I had trusted, |
“I pitied him, and pardoned him, and waited, |
“But shame! oh shame! my enemies and foemen, |
“Certain that he would haughtily and proudly |
“But he, a timorous hireling, would not save me, |
“Then odious doubt o’erwhelmed me swift and horrid. |
“For how could he, this God superb and powerful, |
“No, no, my righteous hopes were not prostrated; |
“So blind with doubt and hideous dread repulsive, |
“And though the heavy huge nails rent and tore me, |
“And there beside me in the gloom, repenting, |
“Oh man, oh man! I then called out in anguish. |
“Ah then I knew by lies he was degraded, |
“And from my lips like some swift loosened torrent, |
“I now can scorn all hatred to dissemble, |
“Gaze in my pallid face, my worn eyes tearful, |
“And seeing me here, borne down by Fate’s contention, |
“Cast out of Heaven and Hell my woful spirit, |
“Betrayed, beguiled, an object of derision, |
“Let all the world know of my anguish dormant, |
Then the sad silence of my vision rending, |
’Twas o’er, the martyr ghost far from me fluttered, |
Science and Speculation
“Step by step mankind move around their circumscribed circle of knowledge, science constantly correcting its mistakes and readjusting on the following day the erroneous theories of the preceding one.”—Madame Blavatsky.
This statement, in various forms, is often put forth by those who should be aware of its falsity. That it is received and echoed by those who are not able correctly to define the word science, is no matter of surprise. It is only surprising that those who, like the brilliant Russian lady above quoted, are able, if they will, clearly to discriminate between science and hypothesis or conjecture impute to one the unstable character of the other.
Science never corrects its mistakes, for it never makes any. The mathematical demonstration of yesterday is not corrected to-day, and it will not be readjusted to-morrow. The brilliant discoveries of Kopernik, Galileo, Newton, and a host of savans, in former times encountered the bitter opposition of ignorance, mistaken zeal, and blind reverence for ancient dogmas, and the same opposition has met the no less important discoveries of more recent times.
It is a fact within the recollection of many at the present day that the study of geology was excluded from some of the higher institutions of learning in this country, because it conflicted with what is now considered an erroneous interpretation of the book of Genesis. It was thought to be one of the mistakes of science, which was to be corrected as mankind moved “around their circumscribed circle of knowledge.” The learned men who rejected it failed to discriminate between a theory or hypothesis, which originated in tradition, and a science based on observed facts. The same lack of discrimination is manifested with regard to discoveries which have recently been made or which are now in progress.
In ancient times the deductive method of reasoning was followed in almost everything. People sought to establish relations between assumed causes and observed phenomena, instead of tracing those phenomena back to their causes. The conclusions arrived at were oftener wrong than right, and the so-called science of those times was certainly open to such criticism as that of Madame Blavatsky. Since the time of Bacon, the inductive method of <... continues on page 8-95 >
Editor's notes
- ↑ Science and Speculation by unknown author
